IPSec-Site-to-Site-Tunnel-Flapping jedes Mal, wenn eine Änderung an der Gerätevorlage vorgenommen wird

Einführung

In diesem Dokument wird das typische Problem beschrieben, das auftritt, wenn IPSec-Tunnel auf der Basis von Internet Key Exchange (IKE) an einem Standort-zu-Standort (oder auch allgemein als LAN-zu-LAN bezeichnet) auf jedem Gerätevorlagenupdate in einem vManage-Controller flattern, die Ursachen erläutert und eine Lösung für das Problem bietet.

Problem

IKE-basierter IPSec-Tunnel flapst jedes Mal, wenn die Gerätemelsion in vManage aktualisiert wird. Änderungen können überhaupt nicht mit IKE-basiertem Site-to-Site-IPSec-Tunnel zusammenhängen, aber es verursacht Flapping im Tunnel. Das Problem kann sogar noch schlimmer aufdecken, wenn eBGP-Peering beispielsweise über IPSec-Tunnel läuft. Aufgrund der eBGP-Schnittstellenverfolgung werden Nachbarn ebenfalls abstempeln und somit alle Routen zurückgezogen und dann wieder installiert. Dies führt wiederum zu Unterbrechungen des Datenverkehrs. Dies ist z. B. die einzige Änderung an der Vorlage, die durch die Konfigurationsvorschau bestätigt wurde, wie im Bild gezeigt.

So sieht es in den Protokollen aus:

tail /var/log/vsyslog -f -n 0
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:08 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:8 fib-update severity-level:minor host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 address-family-type:ipv4 fib-last-update-time:2019-11-26T15:18:09+00:00
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: %ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.0.1 Down
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-FTMD-6-INFO-1000001: VPN 1 Interface ipsec1 DOWN
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:13 bgp-peer-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 peer:10.0.0.1 bgp-new-state:idle local-address:10.0.0.2 local-routerid:10.10.10.242 peer-routerid:192.168.9.1
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:13 interface-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 if-name:"ipsec1" new-state:down
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:13 system-commit severity-level:minor host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 user-name:"vmanage-admin"
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:14 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-FTMD-6-INFO-1000001: VPN 1 Interface ipsec1 UP. Speed 10 Duplex Full
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:14 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:14 interface-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 if-name:"ipsec1" new-state:up
local7.warn: Nov 26 15:21:18 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: 10.0.0.1 unrecognized capability code: 70 - ignored
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:18 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: %ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.0.1 Up
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:18 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:18 bgp-peer-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 peer:10.0.0.1 bgp-new-state:established local-address:10.0.0.2 local-routerid:10.10.10.242 peer-routerid:192.168.9.1

Wie Sie sehen können, hat der BGP-Nachbarn ein Flapping ausgelöst. Im /var/log/messages sehen Sie weitere Informationen:

auth.info: Nov 26 15:24:38 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27423]: Accepted publickey for vmanage-admin from 10.10.10.253 port 40555 ssh2: RSA SHA256:ySiw9uiBxffv6HrO0iwDE3jm05mmO4IQoc+qgzfuyd4
authpriv.info: Nov 26 15:24:38 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27423]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user vmanage-admin by (uid=0)
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:38 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 assigned to groups: vmanage-admin,log
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:38 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 new tcp session for user "vmanage-admin" from 10.10.10.253
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}get attrs: nc:message-id="1"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 get attrs: nc:message-id="1"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="1"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}get attrs: nc:message-id="2"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 get attrs: nc:message-id="2"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="2"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}get attrs: nc:message-id="3"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 get attrs: nc:message-id="3"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="3"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}get attrs: nc:message-id="4"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 get attrs: nc:message-id="4"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="4"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}lock attrs: nc:message-id="5"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 lock target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="5"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="5"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}copy-config attrs: nc:message-id="6"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 copy-config source=running target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="6"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="6"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}edit-config attrs: nc:message-id="7"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 edit-config target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="7"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="7"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}validate attrs: nc:message-id="8"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 validate source=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="8"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="8"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}validate attrs: nc:message-id="9"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 validate source=inline attrs: nc:message-id="9"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="9"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}edit-config attrs: nc:message-id="10"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 edit-config target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="10"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="10"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}commit attrs: nc:message-id="11"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 commit attrs: nc:message-id="11"
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 14[CFG] unloaded shared key with id 'ipsec1_1'
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[CFG] vici terminate IKE_SA 'ipsec1_1'
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] closing CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{8} with SPIs 00000107_i (6247108 bytes) 12107f74_o (6235990 bytes) and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] closing CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{8} with SPIs 00000107_i (6247108 bytes) 12107f74_o (6235990 bytes) and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[KNL] Deleting SAD entry with SPI 00000107
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[KNL] Deleting SAD entry with SPI 12107f74
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] sending DELETE for ESP CHILD_SA with SPI 00000107
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 226869087 [ HASH D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (76 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] closing CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{9} with SPIs 00000108_i (6247912 bytes) 1286959a_o (6235990 bytes) and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] closing CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{9} with SPIs 00000108_i (6247912 bytes) 1286959a_o (6235990 bytes) and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[KNL] Deleting SAD entry with SPI 00000108
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: %ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.0.1 Down
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[KNL] Deleting SAD entry with SPI 1286959a
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-FTMD-6-INFO-1000001: VPN 1 Interface ipsec1 DOWN
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] sending DELETE for ESP CHILD_SA with SPI 00000108
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2972009957 [ HASH D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (76 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] deleting IKE_SA ipsec1_1[10] between 192.168.9.242[192.168.9.242]...192.168.9.1[192.168.9.1]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] deleting IKE_SA ipsec1_1[10] between 192.168.9.242[192.168.9.242]...192.168.9.1[192.168.9.1]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] sending DELETE for IKE_SA ipsec1_1[10]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 956819772 [ HASH D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (92 bytes)
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 begin
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{0}/interface{ge0/0}/description set to "mpls"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{1}/interface{ipsec1}/ike/authentication-type/pre-shared-key/pre-shared-secret set to "****"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-system:system/pseudo-confirm-commit set to "300"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 end
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="11"
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:39 bgp-peer-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 peer:10.0.0.1 bgp-new-state:idle local-address:10.0.0.2 local-routerid:10.10.10.242 peer-routerid:192.168.9.1
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/vpn}bgp-peer-state-change
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:39 interface-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 if-name:"ipsec1" new-state:down
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/vpn}interface-state-change
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:39 system-commit severity-level:minor host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 user-name:"vmanage-admin"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/system}system-commit
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 14[CFG] added vici connection: ipsec1_1
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 14[CFG] loaded IKE shared key with id 'ipsec1_1' for: '192.168.9.242', '192.168.9.1'
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 14[CFG] vici initiate 'child_ipsec1_1'
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 15[IKE] initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ipsec1_1[11] to 192.168.9.1
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 15[IKE] initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ipsec1_1[11] to 192.168.9.1
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 15[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 15[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[500] to 192.168.9.1[500] (180 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] received packet: from 192.168.9.1[500] to 192.168.9.242[500] (104 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[500] to 192.168.9.1[500] (244 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[NET] received packet: from 192.168.9.1[500] to 192.168.9.242[500] (304 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[IKE] received Cisco Unity vendor ID
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[IKE] received DPD vendor ID
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[ENC] received unknown vendor ID: 5e:b0:e6:33:27:48:bf:3b:80:a6:a7:d5:cd:37:64:1f
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[IKE] received XAuth vendor ID
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[IKE] faking NAT situation to enforce UDP encapsulation
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (108 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[NET] received packet: from 192.168.9.1[4500] to 192.168.9.242[4500] (76 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[IKE] IKE_SA ipsec1_1[11] established between 192.168.9.242[192.168.9.242]...192.168.9.1[192.168.9.1]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[IKE] IKE_SA ipsec1_1[11] established between 192.168.9.242[192.168.9.242]...192.168.9.1[192.168.9.1]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[IKE] scheduling rekeying in 13069s
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 14509s
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[ENC] generating QUICK_MODE request 1775307947 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (316 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[NET] received packet: from 192.168.9.1[4500] to 192.168.9.242[4500] (348 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[ENC] parsed QUICK_MODE response 1775307947 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID N((24576)) ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[KNL] add SAD entry with SPI 00000109
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[KNL] add SAD entry with SPI d8c172fc
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{10} established with SPIs 00000109_i d8c172fc_o and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{10} established with SPIs 00000109_i d8c172fc_o and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-FTMD-6-INFO-1000001: VPN 1 Interface ipsec1 UP. Speed 10 Duplex Full
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[ENC] generating QUICK_MODE request 1775307947 [ HASH ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (60 bytes)
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:40 interface-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 if-name:"ipsec1" new-state:up
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/vpn}interface-state-change
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:44 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}unlock attrs: nc:message-id="12"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:44 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 unlock target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="12"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:44 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="12"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:46 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 close-session attrs: nc:message-id="13"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:46 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="13"
auth.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27428]: Received disconnect from 10.10.10.253 port 40555:11: Closed due to user request.
auth.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27428]: Disconnected from user vmanage-admin 10.10.10.253 port 40555
authpriv.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27423]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user vmanage-admin
local7.warn: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: 10.0.0.1 unrecognized capability code: 70 - ignored
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: %ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.0.1 Up
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:47 bgp-peer-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 peer:10.0.0.1 bgp-new-state:established local-address:10.0.0.2 local-routerid:10.10.10.242 peer-routerid:192.168.9.1
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/vpn}bgp-peer-state-change

Achten Sie besonders auf diese Posten:

local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{0}/interface{ge0/0}/description set to "mpls"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{1}/interface{ipsec1}/ike/authentication-type/pre-shared-key/pre-shared-secret set to "****"

Obwohl nur die Schnittstellenbeschreibung in der Vorlage geändert wurde, wurde der Schnittstellentaste ipsec1 aus irgendeinem Grund ebenfalls aktualisiert.

Lösung

1. Zunächst einmal ist es derzeit nicht möglich, ein solches Problem zu vermeiden, wenn vManage-Gerätemodellen auf der Grundlage von Funktionsvorlagen verwendet werden. vManage-Funktionsvorlagen verwenden ein Klartext-Kennwort. Aufgrund des Hashtyps vom Typ 8 wird dieses jedes Mal neu generiert, wenn Änderungen an der Vorlage vorgenommen werden. Sie müssen daher zu CLI-Vorlagen mit aktuellen Softwareversionen wechseln. Hash Typ 8 ist ein Verschlüsselungstext, der mit Symbolen im Wert von 8$ beginnt.

Dieses Verhalten wird unter der Defect Identifier CSCvn20971 dokumentiert.

Außerdem wird eine Erweiterungsanforderung für die Funktionsvorlagen CSCvr86574 geöffnet.

2. Wenn CLI-basierte Gerätevorlagen verwendet werden, kann das Problem vermieden werden, wenn der in der Gerätekonfiguration angegebene Hash Typ 8 anstelle des Klartext-Kennworts verwendet wird. Darüber hinaus muss die Einstellung Manage Encrypted Password (Verschlüsseltes Kennwort verwalten) in den vManage-Einstellungen auf Enabled (Aktiviert) festgelegt werden, um eine erneute Berechnung verschlüsselter Kennwörter vom Typ 8 zu vermeiden. Diese finden Sie unter Administration >Settings.

Nach der Anwendung können Sie die Vorlage erneut drücken. Dies führt dazu, dass der Tunnel zum letzten Mal Flapping ausführt, da er anschließend zuletzt aktualisiert und vManage und das Gerät synchronisiert werden muss. Nahezu bei allen nachfolgenden Versuchen bleibt Tunnel stabil, und die Änderungen werden nur an dem entsprechenden Teil der Konfiguration vorgenommen:

local1.info: Nov 26 15:42:37 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1267 commit thandle 4651 begin
local1.info: Nov 26 15:42:37 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1267 commit thandle 4651 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{0}/interface{ge0/0}/description set to "MPLS"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:42:37 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1267 commit thandle 4651 end

Im nächsten Abschnitt finden Sie die relevante Konfiguration für das standortübergreifende IKE-basierte IPSec im Service-VPN als Referenz.

Konfigurationen

Hier finden Sie die Gerätekonfiguration für Referenzzwecke.

vEdge-Router:

vpn 1
 router
  bgp 65001
   neighbor 10.0.0.1
    no shutdown
    remote-as 65000
   !
  !
 !
 interface ipsec1
  ip address 10.0.0.2/30
  tunnel-source-interface ge0/0
  tunnel-destination      192.168.9.1
  ike
   version      1
   mode         main
   rekey        14400
   cipher-suite aes128-cbc-sha1
   group        2
   authentication-type
    pre-shared-key
     pre-shared-secret $8$cFG/IiaNKkFYXGiHiTCbDEQYcCL4tx1tEhcDh1kO93fzNgc4LDSIIqESFeC6//yU
     local-id          192.168.9.242
     remote-id         192.168.9.1
    !
   !
  !
  ipsec
   rekey                   3600
   replay-window           512
   cipher-suite            aes256-cbc-sha1
   perfect-forward-secrecy group-2
  !
  no shutdown
 !
!

Cisco IOS^®:

router bgp 65000
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 neighbor 10.0.0.2 remote-as 65001
!
crypto keyring KR
  pre-shared-key address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 key testtesttesttest
!
crypto ipsec profile IPSEC_PROFILE
 set transform-set TSET
 set pfs group2
 set isakmp-profile IKE_PROFILE
!
crypto isakmp profile IKE_PROFILE
   keyring KR
   self-identity address
   match identity address 0.0.0.0
!
interface Tunnel1
 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
 tunnel source GigabitEthernet2
 tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
 tunnel destination 192.168.9.242
 tunnel protection ipsec profile IPSEC_PROFILE isakmp-profile IKE_PROFILE
!

Tipp: Aufgrund der Sicherheitsverbesserungen in vEdge seit der Softwareversion 19.1 muss ein Pre-Shared Key mindestens 16 Zeichen lang sein.