Introduction
This document describes how to generate a route leak between Global Routing (GRT) and Virtual Routing Forwarding (VRF) without the use of Next-hop.
Prerequisites
Requirements
Cisco recommends knowledge of these topics:
- Basic IP routing
- Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol concepts and terms
Components Used
This document is not restricted to specific software and hardware versions.
The information in this document was created from the devices in a specific lab environment. All of the devices used in this document started with a cleared (default) configuration. If your network is live, ensure that you understand the potential impact of any command.
Background Information
Route leaking between Global Routing Table (GRT) and Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) table is facilitated with the use of static routes. Either method provides the next-hop IP address (for multi-access segment) or points the route out of an interface (point-to-point interface). However, a static route cannot be used in the absence of a next-hop IP address on a multi-access segment.
Network Diagram
This article refers to this network diagram throughout this process.
BGP Support for IP Prefix Import
Global IPv4 unicast or multicast prefixes are defined as matched criteria for the import route map by the standard Cisco mechanisms like an IP access-list or an IP prefix-list:
access-list 50 permit 10.10.1.0 0.0.0.255
or
ip prefix-list GLOBAL permit 10.10.1.0/24
The IP prefixes that are defined for import and then are processed through a match clause in a route map. IP prefixes that pass through the route map are imported into the VRF:
route-map GLOBAL_TO_VRF permit 10
match ip address 50
or
match ip address prefix-list GLOBAL
!
ip vrf RED
rd 1:1
import ipv4 unicast mapGLOBAL_TO_VRF
!
ip route 10.10.3.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan900
This method requires you use Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) with VRF lite. This method does not work for all scenarios.
Policy Based Routing (PBR)
PBR can be used to leak routes between GRT and VRF. This is a sample configuration where a route leaking from global routing table to VRF is shown:
ip vrf RED
rd 1:1
!
interface Vlan100
description GLOBAL_INTERFACE
ip address 10.10.1.254 255.255.255.0
!
access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.3.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.1.0 0.0.0.255
!
route-map VRF_TO_GLOBAL permit 10
match ip address 101
set global
!
interface Vlan900
description VRF_RED
ip vrf forwarding RED
ip address 10.10.3.254 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map VRF_TO_GLOBAL
This works well for high-end devices like the 6500 switch, but it is not supported for devices like 3750. It is a platform limitation as in the error message like:
3750X(config)#int vlan 900
3750X(config-if)#ip policy route-map VRF_TO_GLOBAL
3750X(config-if)#
Mar 30 02:02:48.758: %PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map VRF_TO_GLOBAL not supported for Policy-Based Routing
VRF Receive
You can use VRF Receive feature to insert the connected GRT subnet as a connected route entry in the VRF routing table:
ip vrf RED
rd 1:1
!
interface Vlan100
description GLOBAL_INTERFACE
ip vrf select source
ip vrf receive RED
ip address 10.10.1.254 255.255.255.0
end
!
interface Vlan900
description VRF_RED
ip vrf forwarding RED
ip address 10.10.3.254 255.255.255.0
end
!
ip route 10.10.3.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan900
3750X#show ip route vrf RED
Routing Table: RED
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.10.3.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan900
L 10.10.3.254/32 is directly connected, Vlan900
C 10.10.1.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan100
L 10.10.1.254/32 is directly connected, Vlan100
3750X#ping 10.10.3.1 source vlan 100
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.3.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 10.10.1.254
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/4/9 ms
3750X#show ip arp vrf RED vlan 900
Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface
Internet 10.10.3.254 - d072.dc36.7fc2 ARPA Vlan900
Internet 10.10.3.1 0 c84c.751f.26f0 ARPA Vlan900
Note: There is no procedure with this configuration for verification or to troubleshoot possible issues.