- Cisco BGP Overview
- BGP 4
- Configuring a Basic BGP Network
- BGP 4 Soft Configuration
- BGP Support for 4-byte ASN
- IPv6 Routing: Multiprotocol BGP Extensions for IPv6
- IPv6 Routing: Multiprotocol BGP Link-Local Address Peering
- IPv6 Multicast Address Family Support for Multiprotocol BGP
- Configuring Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP) Support for CLNS
- Connecting to a Service Provider Using External BGP
- BGP Route-Map Continue
- BGP Route-Map Continue Support for Outbound Policy
- Removing Private AS Numbers from the AS Path in BGP
- Configuring BGP Neighbor Session Options
- BGP Neighbor Policy
- BGP Dynamic Neighbors
- BGP Support for Next-Hop Address Tracking
- BGP Restart Neighbor Session After Max-Prefix Limit Reached
- BGP Support for Dual AS Configuration for Network AS Migrations
- Configuring Internal BGP Features
- BGP VPLS Auto Discovery Support on Route Reflector
- BGP FlowSpec Route-reflector Support
- BGP Flow Specification Client
- BGP NSF Awareness
- BGP Graceful Restart per Neighbor
- BGP Support for BFD
- IPv6 NSF and Graceful Restart for MP-BGP IPv6 Address Family
- BGP Link Bandwidth
- iBGP Multipath Load Sharing
- BGP Multipath Load Sharing for Both eBGP and iBGP in an MPLS-VPN
- Loadsharing IP Packets over More Than Six Parallel Paths
- BGP Policy Accounting
- BGP Policy Accounting Output Interface Accounting
- BGP Cost Community
- BGP Support for IP Prefix Import from Global Table into a VRF Table
- BGP Support for IP Prefix Export from a VRF Table into the Global Table
- BGP per Neighbor SoO Configuration
- Per-VRF Assignment of BGP Router ID
- BGP Next Hop Unchanged
- BGP Support for the L2VPN Address Family
- BGP Event-Based VPN Import
- BGP Best External
- BGP PIC Edge for IP and MPLS-VPN
- Detecting and Mitigating a BGP Slow Peer
- Configuring BGP: RT Constrained Route Distribution
- Configuring a BGP Route Server
- BGP Diverse Path Using a Diverse-Path Route Reflector
- BGP Enhanced Route Refresh
- Configuring BGP Consistency Checker
- BGP—Origin AS Validation
- BGP MIB Support
- BGP 4 MIB Support for Per-Peer Received Routes
- BGP Support for Nonstop Routing (NSR) with Stateful Switchover (SSO)
- BGP NSR Auto Sense
- BGP NSR Support for iBGP Peers
- BGP Graceful Shutdown
- BGP — mVPN BGP sAFI 129 - IPv4
- BGP-MVPN SAFI 129 IPv6
- BFD—BGP Multihop Client Support, cBit (IPv4 and IPv6), and Strict Mode
- BGP Attribute Filter and Enhanced Attribute Error Handling
- BGP Additional Paths
- BGP-Multiple Cluster IDs
- BGP-VPN Distinguisher Attribute
- BGP-RT and VPN Distinguisher Attribute Rewrite Wildcard
- VPLS BGP Signaling
- Multicast VPN BGP Dampening
- BGP—IPv6 NSR
- BGP-VRF-Aware Conditional Advertisement
- BGP—Selective Route Download
- BGP—Support for iBGP Local-AS
- eiBGP Multipath for Non-VRF Interfaces (IPv4/IPv6)
- L3VPN iBGP PE-CE
- BGP NSR Support for MPLS VPNv4 and VPNv6 Inter-AS Option B
- BGP-RTC for Legacy PE
- BGP PBB EVPN Route Reflector Support
- BGP Monitoring Protocol
- VRF Aware BGP Translate-Update
- BGP Support for MTR
- BGP Accumulated IGP
- BGP MVPN Source-AS Extended Community Filtering
- BGP AS-Override Split-Horizon
- BGP Support for Multiple Sourced Paths Per Redistributed Route
Contents
- Configuring a BGP Route Server
- Finding Feature Information
- Information About BGP Route Server
- The Problem That a BGP Route Server Solves
- BGP Route Server Simplifies SP Interconnections
- Benefits of a BGP Route Server
- Route Server Context Provides Flexible Routing Policy
- Three Stages of Filtering on a Route Server Client
- How to Configure a BGP Route Server
- Configure a Route Server with Basic Functionality
- Configure a Route Server Client To Receive Updates
- Configure a Route Server with Flexible Policy Handling
- Displaying BGP Route Server Information and Troubleshooting Route Server
- Configuration Examples for BGP Route Server
- Example BGP Route Server with Basic Functionality
- Example BGP Route Server Context for Flexible Policy (IPv4 Addressing)
- Example Using Show Commands to See That Route Server Context Routes Overwrite Normal Bestpath
- Example BGP Route Server Context with No Routes Satisfying the Policy
- Example BGP Route Server Context for Flexible Policy (IPv6 Addressing)
- Additional References
- Feature Information for BGP Route Server
Configuring a BGP Route Server
BGP route server is a feature designed for internet exchange (IX) operators that provides an alternative to full eBGP mesh peering among the service providers who have a presence at the IX. The route server provides eBGP route reflection with customized policy support for each service provider. That is, a route server context can override the normal BGP best path for a prefix with a different path based on a policy, or suppress all paths for a prefix and not advertise the prefix. The BGP route server provides reduced configuration complexity and reduced CPU and memory requirements on each border router. The route server also reduces overhead expense incurred by individualized peering agreements.
- Finding Feature Information
- Information About BGP Route Server
- How to Configure a BGP Route Server
- Configuration Examples for BGP Route Server
- Additional References
- Feature Information for BGP Route Server
Finding Feature Information
Your software release may not support all the features documented in this module. For the latest caveats and feature information, see Bug Search Tool and the release notes for your platform and software release. To find information about the features documented in this module, and to see a list of the releases in which each feature is supported, see the feature information table at the end of this module.
Use Cisco Feature Navigator to find information about platform support and Cisco software image support. To access Cisco Feature Navigator, go to www.cisco.com/go/cfn. An account on Cisco.com is not required.
Information About BGP Route Server
The Problem That a BGP Route Server Solves
In order to understand the problem that a BGP route server solves, it is helpful to understand the following information about service provider (SP) peering and the eBGP mesh that results from public peering.
Private vs. Public Peering of Service Providers
Peering is the connecting of two service providers (SPs) for the purpose of exchanging network traffic between them. Peerings are either private or public.
In a private peering, two SPs that want to connect decide on a physical site where their networks can be connected and negotiate a contract that covers the details of the connection arrangement. The two parties provide all of the physical space, network equipment, and services (such as electricity and cooling) required to operate the peering connections.
A public internet exchange (IX), also called a network access point (NAP), is a physical location operated to facilitate the interconnection of multiple SP networks using a shared infrastructure. The IX provides the physical necessities such as rack space for networking devices, electricity, cooling, and a common switching infrastructure required for SPs to directly connect their networks. Unlike private peering, which is typically one-to-one, the IX allows an SP that has a presence at the exchange to connect to multiple peers at a single physical location. The IX provides an alternative to private peering for smaller SPs who do not have the resources required to maintain numerous private peering connections.
Public Peering of SPs within an IX Using BGP
Within the IX, each SP maintains a BGP border router connected to the common switching infrastructure or subnet, as shown in the figure below. In this example, eight different SPs with AS numbers 100 through 800 are connected to the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet through their BGP border routers addressed 10.0.0.1 through 10.0.0.8.
Although each SP’s border router is attached to the shared subnet, BGP sessions between each of the SPs must still be configured and maintained individually, for every other SP with which a given SP wants to establish a peering relationship.
Assuming that each SP wants to connect to every other SP, the resulting full mesh of BGP sessions established is shown in the figure below.
Just as the required iBGP full mesh in an autonomous system presents a scaling and administrative challenge within an SP network, the eBGP full mesh required for peering at an IX presents a challenge for eBGP, for these reasons:
The full mesh of direct peering sessions requires a BGP session to be configured and maintained for each connection.
There is additional operational overhead from contracts that would need to be negotiated with each SP peer connecting to a given provider at the IX.
Because larger global SPs might have a presence at dozens or hundreds of internet exchanges worldwide, and dozens or hundreds of potential peers at each IX, it would be a huge operational expense to connect to all of the small providers. Consequently, the state of peering prior to the BGP Route Server feature is that a large global SP connects to only a subset of other large providers to limit the management and operational overhead. A more scalable alternative to direct peering would allow large global SPs to connect to more small providers.
BGP Route Server Simplifies SP Interconnections
A BGP route server simplifies interconnection of SPs at an IX, as shown in the figure below.
Instead of maintaining individual, direct eBGP peerings with every other provider, an SP maintains only a single connection to the route server operated by the IX. Peering with only the route server reduces the configuration complexity on each border router, reduces CPU and memory requirements on the border routers, and avoids most of the operational overhead incurred by individualized peering agreements.
The route server provides AS-path, MED, and nexthop transparency so that peering SPs at the IX still appear to be directly connected. In reality, the IX route server mediates this peering, but that relationship is invisible outside of the IX.
The figure below illustrates an example of transparent route propagation with a route server at an IX.
In the figure above, a routing update goes from AS 1 to AS 2 to AS 100. The update leaves the router in AS 100 advertising that the router can reach the prefix 10.9.9.0/24, use 10.0.0.1 as the next hop, and use the AS path of AS100, AS2, AS1.
The router in AS 900 is a route server and the router in AS 500 is a route server client. A route server client receives updates from a route server. As shown in the figure above, the router in AS 900 does not change the update; route server updates are transparent in terms of MED, next hop and AS-path. The update goes to the client with the same prefix, next hop and AS-path that came from the router at 10.0.0.1.
Benefits of a BGP Route Server
A BGP route server provides the following benefits:
Reduced configuration complexity on each border router.
Reduced CPU and memory requirements on each border router.
Reduced operational overhead incurred by individualized peering agreements.
The ability for a route server context to override the normal BGP best path with an alternative path based on some policy.
The ability for a route server context to suppress all paths for a prefix and therefore not advertise the prefix.
Route Server Context Provides Flexible Routing Policy
A BGP route server can provide a flexible routing policy. Your network environment might or might not have routes that need a customized (flexible) policy handling.
Routes needing flexible policy handling are selected for import into a route server context by configuring an import map. The import map references a route map, where the actual policy is defined by at least one permit statement. Routes (paths) that match the route map are included in a second "best path" calculation. The resulting best path, if it is different from the global best path, is imported into the context. Router server clients associated with a router server context will override the global best path with the context’s best path when sending routing updates.
Multiple contexts can be created, and the appropriate context is referenced on the route server by the neighbors assigned to use that context (in the neighbor route-server-client command). Thus, multiple neighbors sharing the same policy can share the same route server context.
Three Stages of Filtering on a Route Server Client
With the introduction of route server context, there are now three stages of route filtering that can be applied to a route server client, as shown in the figure below. The three stages of filtering are described below the figure. You can apply all, none, or any combination of the three filtering methods to a route server client. In the figure, the decreasing arrow sizes symbolize that potentially fewer routes might pass each filter than entered the filter.
As shown in the figure above beginning at the left, when incoming eBGP updates arrive from a route server client, the system will apply inbound route filters for a route server client the same way it does for a non-route-server client (configured with the neighbor route-map in command). All routes permitted by the client’s inbound filtering are installed in the global BGP table for the appropriate address family, as usual, and anything else is dropped.
If any route server contexts have been configured with flexible policy using the import-map command, the best path from among the subset of matching routes is imported into the virtual table for the contexts. Route server clients associated with a context will then override any routes from the global BGP table with customized routes from the context’s virtual table when generating updates.
A route server client’s outbound filtering policies (configured with the neighbor route-map out command) will be applied to the global updates that do not have customized policy, and the outbound filtering policies are also applied to any updates generated from the route server context’s virtual table.
How to Configure a BGP Route Server
Configure a Route Server with Basic Functionality
Perform this task to configure a BGP router as route server for IPv4 or IPv6. This task will enable the basic route server functionality for nexthop, AS-path, and MED transparency.
Note | This task does not enable flexible policy handling. To enable flexible policy handling, see the Configure a Route Server with Flexible Policy Handling. |
1.
enable
2.
configure
terminal
3.
router
bgp
autonomous-system-number
4.
neighbor
{ipv4-address|
ipv6-address}
remote-as
remote-as-number
5.
address-family
{ipv4
|
ipv6} {
unicast |
multicast}
6.
neighbor
{ipv4-address|
ipv6-address}
activate
7.
neighbor
{ipv4-address|
ipv6-address}
route-server-client
8.
end
DETAILED STEPS
Configure a Route Server Client To Receive Updates
In the prior task, you configured a route server. A route server does not put its own AS number in the AS-path; there is AS-path transparency. This means the route server client will receive updates in which the first AS number in the AS-path is not the sending router’s AS number.
By default, a router denies an update received from an eBGP peer that does not list its AS number at the beginning of the AS-path in an incoming update. Therefore, you must disable that behavior on the client in order for the client to receive the updates. To do so, perform this task.
1.
enable
2.
configure
terminal
3.
router
bgp
autonomous-system-number
4.
no
bgp
enforce-first-as
5.
neighbor
{ipv4-address|
ipv6-address}
remote-as
remote-as-number
6.
address-family
{ipv4
|
ipv6} {
unicast |
multicast}
7.
neighbor
{ipv4-address|
ipv6-address}
activate
8.
exit-address-family
DETAILED STEPS
Configure a Route Server with Flexible Policy Handling
Perform this task if you need your BGP route server to support a customized, flexible policy in addition to basic route server functionality.
In order to configure flexible policy handling, create a route server context, which includes an import map. The import map references a standard route map.
In this particular configuration task, the policy is based on autonomous system number, so the match as-path command is used. The actual AS number is identified in the ip as-path access-list command. You may match on nexthop, AS path, communities, and extended communities.
1.
enable
2.
configure
terminal
3.
router
bgp
autonomous-system-number
4.
route-server-context
context-name
5.
description
string
6.
address-family
{ipv4
|
ipv6} {
unicast |
multicast}
7.
import-map
route-map-name
8.
exit-address-family
9.
exit-route-server-context
10.
exit
11.
ip
as-path
access-list
access-list-number
{permit|
deny}
regexp
12.
route-map
route-map-name
[permit |
deny]
sequence-number
13.
match
as-path
access-list-number
14.
exit
15.
router
bgp
autonomous-system-number
16.
neighbor
{ipv4-address|
ipv6-address}
remote-as
remote-as-number
17.
address-family
{ipv4
|
ipv6} {
unicast |
multicast}
18.
neighbor
{ipv4-address|
ipv6-address}
activate
19.
neighbor
{ipv4-address|
ipv6-address}
route-server-client
context
ctx-name
20.
end
DETAILED STEPS
Displaying BGP Route Server Information and Troubleshooting Route Server
From privileged EXEC mode, perform either of the steps in this task on a BGP route server to see information about the route server.
On a BGP route server client (not the route server), you can use the show ip bgp ipv4 unicast or show ip bgp ipv6 unicastcommand to display routing information.
1.
enable
2.
show
ip
bgp
{ipv4 | ipv6} unicast route-server {all | {context context-name}} [summary]
3.
debug
ip
bgp
route-server
{client | context | event | import | policy} [detail]
DETAILED STEPS
Configuration Examples for BGP Route Server
Example BGP Route Server with Basic Functionality
In the following example, the neighbor at 10.0.0.1 is a route server client.
router bgp 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 remote-as 100 neighbor 10.0.0.5 remote-as 500 address-family ipv4 unicast neighbor 10.0.0.1 activate neighbor 10.0.0.1 route-server-client !
Example BGP Route Server Context for Flexible Policy (IPv4 Addressing)
In the following example, the local router is a BGP route server. Its neighbors at 10.10.10.12 and 10.10.10.13 are its route server clients. A route server context named ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT is created and applied to the neighbor at 10.10.10.13. The context uses an import map that references a route map named only_AS27_routemap. The route map matches routes permitted by access list 27. Access list 27 permits routes that have 27 in the AS path.
router bgp 65000 route-server-context ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT address-family ipv4 unicast import-map only_AS27_routemap exit-address-family exit-route-server-context ! neighbor 10.10.10.12 remote-as 12 neighbor 10.10.10.12 description Peer12 neighbor 10.10.10.13 remote-as 13 neighbor 10.10.10.13 description Peer13 neighbor 10.10.10.21 remote-as 21 neighbor 10.10.10.27 remote-as 27 ! address-family ipv4 neighbor 10.10.10.12 activate neighbor 10.10.10.12 route-server-client neighbor 10.10.10.13 activate neighbor 10.10.10.13 route-server-client context ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT neighbor 10.10.10.21 activate neighbor 10.10.10.27 activate exit-address-family ! ip as-path access-list 27 permit 27 ! route-map only_AS27_routemap permit 10 match as-path 27 !
- Example Using Show Commands to See That Route Server Context Routes Overwrite Normal Bestpath
- Example BGP Route Server Context with No Routes Satisfying the Policy
Example Using Show Commands to See That Route Server Context Routes Overwrite Normal Bestpath
In the following output, a BGP route server has two routes from AS 21 that have been selected as best:
Route-Server# show ip bgp ipv4 unicast BGP table version is 31, local router ID is 100.100.100.100 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, x best-external, f RT-Filter Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 1.1.1.1/32 10.10.10.21 23 0 21 ? * 10.10.10.27 878 0 27 89 ? * 100.1.1.1/32 10.10.10.27 878 0 27 89 ? *> 10.10.10.21 23 0 21 ?
For Peer12, which has been configured as a route-server client, but not associated with any context, the bestpath is advertised in the following output. Note that AS-path, MED, and nexthop transparency have been maintained; the routes look as if they had not passed through the route server.
Peer12# show ip bgp ipv4 unicast BGP table version is 31, local router ID is 10.10.10.12 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, x best-external, f RT-Filter Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 1.1.1.1/32 10.10.10.21 23 0 21 ? *> 100.1.1.1/32 10.10.10.21 23 0 21 ?
Peer13 has also been configured as a route-server client, and it has been associated with a context named ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT. The context references a route map that permits only routes that contain AS 27 in the AS path. This means that the route-server should not send any routes to Peer13 unless they contains AS 27. In our scenario, the route server indeed sends the routes learned via AS 27, even though the routes learned via AS 21 are marked as best. The output below demonstrates that the normal best path was overriden by the best path based on policy. Again, MED, as-path, and nexthop transparency have been maintained.
Peer13# show ip bgp ipv4 unicast BGP table version is 25, local router ID is 10.10.10.13 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, x best-external, f RT-Filter Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 1.1.1.1/32 10.10.10.27 878 0 27 89 ? *> 100.1.1.1/32 10.10.10.27 878 0 27 89 ?
Example BGP Route Server Context with No Routes Satisfying the Policy
It is possible that, due to policy, no routes are sent to a client even though paths exist. For instance, if we take the prior example and change ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT to ONLY_AS100_CONTEXT, no paths would satisfy this policy and no routes will be sent to the client. The following is the configuration and resulting show output:
Route-Server# show run | begin router bgp router bgp 1 route-server-context ONLY_AS100_CONTEXT ! address-family ipv4 unicast import-map only_AS100_routemap exit-address-family exit-route-server-context ! neighbor 10.10.10.13 remote-as 13 neighbor 10.10.10.13 description Peer13 neighbor 10.10.10.21 remote-as 21 neighbor 10.10.10.27 remote-as 27 ! address-family ipv4 neighbor 10.10.10.13 activate neighbor 10.10.10.13 route-server-client context ONLY_AS100_CONTEXT neighbor 10.10.10.21 activate neighbor 10.10.10.27 activate exit-address-family ! ip as-path access-list 100 permit 100 ! ! route-map only_AS100_routemap permit 10 match as-path 100 !
Because no routes satisfy the policy, no routes appear in the table of Peer13:
Peer13# show ip bgp ipv4 unicast
Example BGP Route Server Context for Flexible Policy (IPv6 Addressing)
In the following example under address-family IPv6, the local router is a BGP route server. Its neighbors at 2001:DB8:1::112 and 2001:DB8:1::113 are its route server clients. A route server context named ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT is created and applied to the neighbor at 2001:DB8:1::113. The context uses an import map that references a route map named only_AS27_routemap. The route map matches routes permitted by access list 27. Access list 27 permits routes that have 27 in the AS path.
Route-Server# show run | begin router bgp router bgp 1 route-server-context ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT address-family ipv6 unicast import-map only_AS27_routemap exit-address-family exit-route-server-context ! neighbor 2001:DB8:1::112 remote-as 12 neighbor 2001:DB8:1::112 description Peer12 neighbor 2001:DB8:1::113 remote-as 13 neighbor 2001:DB8:1::113 description Peer13 ! address-family ipv6 neighbor 2001:DB8:1::112 activate neighbor 2001:DB8:1::112 route-server-client neighbor 2001:DB8:1::113 activate neighbor 2001:DB8:1::113 route-server-client context ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT exit-address-family ! ip as-path access-list 27 permit 27 ! route-map only_AS27_routemap permit 10 match as-path 27 ! Route-Server#show ip bgp ipv6 unicast route-server all summary Route server clients without assigned contexts: Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 2001:DB8:1::112 4 12 19 19 4 0 0 00:12:50 2 Route server clients assigned to context ONLY_AS27_CONTEXT: Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 2001:DB8:1::113 4 13 23 22 4 0 0 00:16:23 2
For Peer12, which has been configured as a route-server client, but not associated with any context, the bestpath is advertised. Note that AS-path, MED, and nexthop transparency have been maintained; the routes look as if they had not passed through the route server.
Peer12# show ip bgp ipv6 unicast BGP table version is 9, local router ID is 2.2.2.2 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, x best-external, f RT-Filter Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * 2001:DB8:1::/64 2001:DB8::113 0 0 13 ? *> :: 0 32768 ? * 2001:DB8:2::/64 2001:DB8::113 0 0 13 ? *> :: 0 32768 ?
Additional References
Related Documents
Related Topic |
Document Title |
---|---|
Cisco IOS commands |
|
BGP commands |
Cisco IOS IP Routing: BGP Command Reference |
BGP configuration tasks |
IP Routing: BGP Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS XE Release 3S |
MIBs
MIB |
MIBs Link |
---|---|
To locate and download MIBs for selected platforms, Cisco software releases, and feature sets, use Cisco MIB Locator found at the following URL: |
Technical Assistance
Description |
Link |
---|---|
The Cisco Support and Documentation website provides online resources to download documentation, software, and tools. Use these resources to install and configure the software and to troubleshoot and resolve technical issues with Cisco products and technologies. Access to most tools on the Cisco Support and Documentation website requires a Cisco.com user ID and password. |
Feature Information for BGP Route Server
The following table provides release information about the feature or features described in this module. This table lists only the software release that introduced support for a given feature in a given software release train. Unless noted otherwise, subsequent releases of that software release train also support that feature.
Use Cisco Feature Navigator to find information about platform support and Cisco software image support. To access Cisco Feature Navigator, go to www.cisco.com/go/cfn. An account on Cisco.com is not required.
Feature Name |
Releases |
Feature Information |
---|---|---|
BGP Route Server |
Cisco IOS XE Release 3.3S 15.2(3)T |
BGP route server is a feature designed for internet exchange (IX) operators that provides an alternative to full eBGP mesh peering among the service providers who have a presence at the IX. The route server provides eBGP route reflection with customized policy support for each service provider. That is, a route server context can override the normal BGP best path for a prefix with a different path based on a policy, or suppress all paths for a prefix and not advertise the prefix. The BGP route server provides reduced configuration complexity and reduced CPU and memory requirements on each border router. The route server also reduces overhead expense incurred by individualized peering agreements. The following commands were introduced: |